> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Spam using invalid Mime headers to bypass
> SpamAssassin?
> 
> 
> I got an email that made it by spamassassin with virtually no hits, 
> which looks like it used some wierd mime technique to get through 
> spamassassin. I put the source of the email at 
> http://h0b0.net/brokenmime.txt. I also edited the message and 
> put some 
> simple mime headers in it and passed it through spamassassin 
> and it got 
> 7.7 hits, I put the source of that at http://h0b0.net/fixedmime.txt.
> 
> Is it valid to specify a different boundary in the mime 
> header (when not 
> attaching a rfc822 source message)? This message did that it appears, 
> though I'm no mime expert so I'm not sure if that is a valid 
> thing to do 
> or not. In any case, is this a bug of some sort with SpamAssassin?
> 
> Ryan Moore
> ----------
> Perigee.net Corporation
> 704-849-8355 (sales)
> 704-849-8017 (tech)
> www.perigee.net
> 


There have been similar methods used in the past. I have forwarded a bunch
today to 2 people and I am awaiting a reply. This is a base64+mime trick.
The body, rawbody, and uri rules simply get skipped over due to this trick.
They have basically taken it one step further and added this pic.gif part. I
hadn't realised that in the original thread about this kind of email. 

Temporary trick. The devs should have an answer soon for it. 

--Chris Santerre


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to