Hi,
Does anyone have any evidence (empircal or anecdotal) as to how well
2.5x fares against 2.4x using Bayes sitewide with minimal training (no
more than SA does when autolearning)?
It's my understanding (BICBW) that most of the PHRASE rules disappeared
in 2.5x in favour of Bayes. Which is all well and good if autolearning
sitewide is an acceptable compromise. But I haven't seen much discussion
one way or the other.
N
--
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
-- The 75 column-ometer
Global Messaging, A: Top posting
120 Cheapside, x83331 Q: What's the most annoying e-mail habit?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
