Patrick Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trying to seed the Bayes databases with other people's spam probably > isn't a good idea -- the whole idea is that it learns what *your* ham > and spam look like. Filling it up with mail from other sources is > probably just going to lead to innacurate results.
I understand not feeding it other people's ham, but I don't see a problem using other people's spam - assuming it's "normal looking spam". -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes Computer Systems Manager ph: 979-845-7801 Department of Physics fax: 979-845-2590 Texas A&M University ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
