At Thu Aug 14 17:40:19 2003, Ricardo Kleemann wrote: > > The output from spamc didn't even show a score for bayes. > Shouldn't it at least show a percentile score for bayes? > Here's what it reported: > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 > > tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,MSGID_HAS_NO_AT,US_DOLLARS_3 > version=2.55
BAYES_40,44,50,56 are allocated 0 points in the scores distributed with SA. This means that those rules will never show up in the analysis. You can work around this by adding the following lines to the local.cf file: score BAYES_40 0 0 0.001 0.001 score BAYES_44 0 0 0.001 0.001 score BAYES_50 0 0 0.001 0.001 score BAYES_56 0 0 0.001 0.001 0.001 is enough to get the rule name into the report, without significantly skewing the scoring. Martin -- Martin Radford | "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff -o) Registered Linux user #9257 | on ftp and let the rest of the world /\\ - see http://counter.li.org | mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds _\_V ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
