Ryan Moore ---------- Perigee.net Corporation 704-849-8355 (sales) 704-849-8017 (tech) www.perigee.net
Greg Webster wrote:
Thanks, it is. What I'm wondering now is how the local user's address is in the Return-Path header. Unless the spammer is forging the Return-Path header (making it the same as the recipient), in which case we can't really trust the Return-Path header at all for whitelisting.
Greg
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 15:10:13 -0400: Matt Kettler skribon:
At 10:58 AM 8/14/2003 -0700, Greg Webster wrote:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is not in our whitelist, and neither is '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' or any variant.
It appears that there is a problem with the USER_IN_WHITELIST regexp to me, but I may be mistaken. I can't think of any other way that this would have made it through. Help?
is [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your whitelist_from?
If so, then the rule properly matched the Return-Path header.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk