I think the point is that your rule is probably doing exactly what you told it to do: assigning any message that has the letters "sex" in it 50 points. I'll bet if you save the encoded messages out to text files and do a "grep sex [filename]" on them, you'll find they do have those letters in that order in them somewhere.

Robin Witkop-Staub wrote:

But what is improper about it?  The coding looks correct to me?  Its a
filter running and looking for any instance or combination of the word
"sex".  And we do want to assign it 50 points so it definitely gets
rejected.



Here is my filter:
#body RAVEN_SEX       /sex/i
#describe RAVEN_SEX   contains advertising sex by any name
#score RAVEN_SEX      50.0




_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk




This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the 
intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and 
CONFIDENTIAL.  If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or 
distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in 
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this 
message and any attachments.

In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the 
Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as 
social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and 
passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.

Reply via email to