Re: [SAtalk] Rule for no web site?

[Patrick Morris]

I'd immediately disable a rule like this.  Many sites either have no 
website (such as the domain I use at home), or don't allow ICMP through 
to their webservers (like the domain I use at work).  You'd probably get 
FPs on mail from me no matter where I sent it from.

Michael Clark wrote:

Would a rule that adds points for no pingable web site for a domain be 
useful? If spam comes in from [EMAIL PROTECTED], could 
http://www.example.com be tested? If you get a 404 or no response, 
give the message a couple points. Just an idea, Mike






This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the 
intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and 
CONFIDENTIAL.  If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or 
distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in 
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this 
message and any attachments.
In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the 
Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as 
social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and 
passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.