On 08/11/03 02:19 PM, Bart Schaefer sat at the `puter and typed: > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Support wrote: > > > For example, the Date doesn't seem to be 6-12 hours before the > > Received: dates; it looks OK to me. > > > Received: from metromaster.physics.campus.edu > > (metromaster.physics.campus.edu [1.1.16.30]) > > by scud.iquest.campus.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h77G95408054 > > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 09:09:05 -0700 > > Date: Thu, 07 Aug 03 09:09:06 Pacific Daylight Time > > Spelling out "Pacific Daylight Time" is not a standards-compliant way to > specify the timezone. My guess is that SA is (justifiably) not parsing > that, is therefore interpreting the timezone from Date: as UT/GMT, rather > than PDT, and thus finds it to be -0700 hours out of kilter.
In addition, you have your spam threshold set at 3.0, which is a little low. The default is 5.0. The message in question came in at 3.2, which would have been let through as real email, not spam. Lou -- Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ Johnson's First Law: When any mechanical contrivance fails, it will do so at the most inconvenient possible time. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
