Hmm, thats a shame that all_spam_to fools the AWL like that, because as postmaster, I have abuse@ and postmaster@ listed in all_spam_to.
Well, it doesn't really "fool" it.. the AWL is a fundamentally very simple minded beast. It's a historical score averager.. nothing more, nothing less. And it's this basic simplicity that makes it work pretty well at what it should do.
But when you start mixing in massive negative scoring rules, the AWL averages those the same way it averages everything else.. but in a hypothetical 2-spam situation averaging -80 (+20 scoring mail to all_spam_to'ed user) and +20 (second spam to normal user) still results in a score of -30.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
