> -----Original Message----- > From: Kai MacTane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 2:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Wired Article > > > At 8/4/03 10:36 AM , Gary Funck wrote: > > >Nice article. Rather than looking for higher scores, I like > writing new > >rules that stomp out the latest vermin that sneak under the > radar screen. > >A good day is when no spams show up in my inbox. > > Same here. I redirect anything scoring over about 7 points > straight to > /dev/null, and I'm much more interested in the messages that > score just > below my spam threshold. My question isn't so much "what's the > highest-scoring spam?" (especially since I'll never see > those); instead, I > want to look at the *lowest-scoring* spam (and figure out how > to make it > score higher). > > --Kai MacTane > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > "I think that somehow/Somewhere inside of us, > We must be similar/If not the same." > --Suzanne Vega, > "Left of Center" > > >
Another great minds think a like, example :) Each one of those few (1-4 a week) little spams that sneak under my 7 point limit for non-delievery get carefully fondled by my eyes. Note taken, rule written, spam tested. Ummmm.....great feeling :) Chris Santerre System Admin and SA Custom Rules Emporium keeper http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm "A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men." - Willy Wonka ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
