> -----Original Message-----
> From: Garth Serjeantson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I've seen several different ways of doing this. I was wondering if
> there is a general consensus on which is the best way of
> configuring SA for PF on a RH8 box. Any thoughts?
I make a non-privileged user account to pipe the messages to using Procmail.
Using the ${sender} ${recipient} variables for content_filter, I can carry
the envelope sender and recipient. In my recipe, I can then use formail to
inject a custom header line that I can use in later checks.
The recipe looks like:
SENDER = "<$1>"
SHIFT = 1
RCPT=| echo "$@"
RECIPIENT= `echo $RCPT | /bin/sed 's/^/</; s/ /> </g; s/$/>/'`
:0 fhw
| (formail -A "X-Merlin-MailFrom: $SENDER") \
| (formail -A "X-Merlin-RcptTo: $RECIPIENT")
This has really helped for custom header verifications.
SA is one of the checks that I perform via Procmail. Because Procmail is
the processor, I can use as many filtration engines as I want or need. I
only need to use SA but I have the flexibility to add or test whenever
needed.
Bottom line is that, although cryptic at times, Procmail adds a lot of
flexibility for your own customization. I wrote a Webmin module to
administrate the gateway which includes the recipe structure.
You are right though, there are a lot of ways to solve the same problem.
--Larry
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
