-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I would suggest two things:
1) Use the Bayesian feature of SA so that it can "learn" to distinguish spam better. 2) Instead of blindingly strengtening all rules, try to figure out some new rules that are likely to catch the spam you are getting and not legitimate mail. It is best to have many rules with small scores than a few rules with large scores. On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 04:27:31AM +0200, Bonny wrote: > As from the subject... what can I do if some spam passes the filter? Is > there any way to strongen the filters, without getting false positives? > > Thank you... > > -- > Bonny - Registered Linux User #251752 > --- VB LUG Moderator --- > If a program is useless, it must be documented. - -- Daniel Carrera | OpenPGP fingerprint: Mathematics Dept. | 6643 8C8B 3522 66CB D16C D779 2FDD 7DAC 9AF7 7A88 UMD, College Park | http://www.math.umd.edu/~dcarrera/pgp.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (SunOS) iD8DBQE/Izr/nxE8DWHf+OcRAhcLAKDIZZw1n0lRx88zwwzjLRZCNovR5ACg3AXb XlJsVyYuagqMCPf4I5FU2cg= =zy+P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
