give me any output at all, i.e. none of my ham emails *at all* are listed in razor or pyzor. I notice also that *almost all* of the spam that lands in my inbox, i.e. that spamassassin misses, triggers razor or pyzor, but that this wasn't enough. I am coming to the conclusion that, for _me_ at least, bumping up the scores for these three tests might be a good idea. I am running this past the newsgroup so they can tell me what disasters are about to befall me!
Personally, I wouldn't do that, as I've seen far too many times where Razor triggers, sometimes with the highest confidence setting, on emails that are clearly not spam. One good example is just about any message sent by Incredimail, legitimate or otherwise seems to trigger razor with a high confidence level.
Expect plenty of false positives if you bump up the score too much.
On the other hand if you're not already using DCC, look into installing it alongside Razor and Pyzor. A DCC hit counts for 2.6 points every time, and although DCC is supposed to list "bulk mail" instead of "spam" in my experience it has far less false positives than Razor.
This tends to be corroborated by the fact that the GA gave DCC a relatively high score of 2.6, which is a lot higher than either Razor or Pyzor.
Out of Razor2, DCC, and Pyzor, I've come to the conclusion that DCC is the most effective, although I'm running all three, which is better again.
Regards, Simon
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
