On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 12:06:19PM -0700, John Birkhead wrote: > I was looking through the tests performed and noticed that > "RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_n_n" tests give a score of 0.001 for each score through > 100%. Given what I know (which may not be a lot) this means that even a 90% > certainty of spam would affect the overall spam score.
in 2.55, no RAZOR2_CF_RANGE score is 0.001: score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_01_10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.157 score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_11_20 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.418 score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_21_30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.767 score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_31_40 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.414 score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_41_50 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.534 score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_60 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.594 score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_61_70 0.0 score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_71_80 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.909 score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_81_90 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.959 score RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_91_100 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.208 the scores for set 1 are 0 because of a bug found during the mass-checks, so the results were inaccurate. The set3 scores are good though. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "We are used to a deep-rooted Arab tradition of democracy where results are first declared, then elections are conducted and votes brought in to affirm it." - Talal Salman, editor of the As-Safir newspaper in Lebanon
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
