At 10:01 AM 7/15/2003 -0400, Gaurav Hariani wrote:
I've been (almost) spam free for almost a month since I
installed spamassassin. But today I received spam that had a -ve score.

I don't know much about spamassassin, so could someone explain how this
happened and what can I do to catch this sort of thing.

------Header Snippet------
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
        boundary="----=_Part_24205_18121939.1058274309678"
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0
        tests=BAYES_01,CLICK_BELOW,HTML_80_90,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,
              HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,
              HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,HTML_WEB_BUGS
        version=2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

The first thing that jumps out at me is the BAYES_01. That means that the bayes engine very strongly believes that this email isn't spam. You probably need to revisit your bayes training. The BAYES_01 gave it a negative 5.4 score adjustment, which is a huge swing. Admittedly this message doesn't contain many strong spam phrases, but nothing in there should be a strong non-spam sign either.



Make sure you feed sa-learn some good examples of spam and nonspam messages, that should help considerably.





------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to