Thanks. It's not a biggie. It's only taking .1 seconds to scan most messages anyways (with just rule checking, no rbls, no razor, etc). Thanks for letting me know.
-Chris -----Original Message----- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 5:41 PM To: Chris Ochap; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Exit when threshold/score reached At 04:42 PM 7/9/2003 -0800, Chris Ochap wrote: >I know I saw the option for spamassassin/spamd to stop scanning once the >appropriate users score has been reached, but I cannot find it again. I >have spamd/spamc running on qmail/vpopmail/maildrop with per user >configs. I don't see it in perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf, spamd -h, >or spamc -h. Did I hallucinate this option? :) It has been removed because it caused FP's. The problem with this option is that for it to work properly, all negative scoring rules must be run first, then all positive scoring rules... However, for efficiency reasons, SA runs all the header checks first, then all the body checks. If a message scores over your threshold in the header checks, but would later be dropped down by negative scoring body rules, it would wind up exiting and be incorrectly tagged as spam. Running the rules in order of score chews up a lot of CPU time, and doesn't benefit many spams. see: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1981 In which Dan Q eludes to the consideration of adding decision tree methods as a better alternative. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
