Yorkshire Dave wrote on 26 Jun 2003 15:13:41 +0100: > Maybe something like a mime-part variance score can be made, percentage > difference between plain and stripped html messages, or maybe even as > simple as picking a few words at random from each part and looking for > them in the other part. That would give something else to score spam on, > or maybe just for bayes to modify its behaviour against messages with > large differences in mime parts. >
Maybe even better: just skip the text/plain part of multipart/alternative messages? After all, they are supposed to be the same content. I agree, though, if SA would do a compare you could get an extra spamminess indicator from that. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
