Gordon Cormack wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:51:19 -0400: > but I have no sensible > way for it to separate ham/spam, >
There is none, you cannot completely rely on SA doing it for you, you have to be the last authority. What I do is: 1. some spamtrap email addresses are unscanned and get all spam they can gulp and get directed in one mailbox called spamtrap. From time to time I have a look at the mailbox and delete all messages which are not spam (this is very very rare) and then feed the complete mailbox as spam to Bayes. 2. in some of our mailboxes I delete all spam (which are just very few messages because we quarantine all spam and don't flood the inboxes with it) and delete some of the ham messages I think could corrupt Bayes with spammy looking stuff as ham and then feed the boxes as ham to Bayes. This helps me keep a reasonable ratio, although the spam count currently far outweighs the ham count in the db. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
