OK, I've had some problems
tagging this repetitive spam. I'm using SA 2.43 (quiet you!) :)
I'm getting excellent
results! But this one has got me goofy. It simply skips some of my rules!! I'm
not sure why. In the header you can see it hits MY_DSL which is a header rule.
But I have a specific rawbody rule for "Stop Mailings here" and a rawbody rule
for a Q without a U. This spam somehow skips about 7 more rules that
should hit!
I remember a thread about
this last week, but didn't pay enough attention to it :(
Why would body rules be
skipped?
Chris
Received: from utoronto.ca (adsl-156-95-249.asm.bellsouth.net [66.156.95.249]) by myserver.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id h5MMtGFe031838 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 18:55:18 -0400 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Dwayne Bright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: *****SPAM***** What is your name? Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 15:36:17 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0F7E_39A32FCC.4A01866D" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.6 required=5.0 tests=BASE64_ENC_TEXT,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MY_DSL, SPAM_PHRASE_01_02 version=2.43 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.43 (1.115.2.20-2002-10-15-exp) X-Spam-Report: 5.60 hits, 5 required; * 3.0 -- Contains likely dsl address in header * 0.5 -- BODY: Spam phrases score is 01 to 02 (low) [score: 1] * 1.4 -- RAW: Message text disguised using base-64 encoding * 0.7 -- RAW: Message text in HTML without specified charset This is a multi-part message in MIME
format.
------=_NextPart_000_0F7E_39A32FCC.4A01866D
Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ------=_NextPart_000_0F7E_39A32FCC.4A01866D
Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 ------=_NextPart_000_0F7E_39A32FCC.4A01866D--
|
- Re: [SAtalk] BASE64_ENC_TEXT skipping rules??? Chris Santerre
- Re: [SAtalk] BASE64_ENC_TEXT skipping rules??? satalk
- Re: [SAtalk] BASE64_ENC_TEXT skipping rules??? Matt Kettler
- Re: [SAtalk] BASE64_ENC_TEXT skipping rules??? Matt Kettler
- Re: [SAtalk] BASE64_ENC_TEXT skipping rules??? Kai Schaetzl
- RE: [SAtalk] BASE64_ENC_TEXT skipping rules??? Chris Santerre
- RE: [SAtalk] BASE64_ENC_TEXT skipping rules??? Chris Santerre