Justin Mason wrote on Sat, 21 Jun 2003 12:12:01 -0700: > Not the case -- whitelist settings are ignored for auto-learning. So > if the mail is judged as spam without the WL score applied, it'll > be auto-learned as spam.
I see, thanks. I looked at his stats and it looked like it was learned only because of the whitelist. > Content analysis details: (-101.30 points, 5 required) This gives -1.30 which is below (or above, depending on your POV) the auto-learn threshold, so I thought it must have been the extra -100. He must have adjusted it. > > But I agree, a better fix is to *ignore* any mails that hit a WL > or BL line. There's a bug open to do this. > Thanks! Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
