[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> but now what i want to do is run a local copy of an rbl on a local > name server, to reduce network latency and increase reliability, > and given the operational unpleasantness of microsoft dns on NT, > i don't want to put it there.
In 2.60, RBL lookups are going to be a *lot* faster. I should do some benchmarks vs. 2.55, but you should notice a very nice improvement.
I'm curious, what kind of changes are responsible for the improvement ?
Will the requests be done fully asyncronously and in parrallel with normal processing ? (or is it already done this way....)
Regards, Simon
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
