This came in with the SA version below, shall I report this via Bugzilla? X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.63 Beta/7) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-cvs (1.190-2003-06-01-exp) X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.3 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_THEBAT FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN autolearn=no version=2.60-cvs
I also wonder, if it should really be allowed that a rule which only relies on headers from the past should be allowed to solely flag a message as spam (I mean, should it have such high scores). After all, this rule will get triggered each time the client developers change that string and will tag all future mail from that client as spam until it gets fixed. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
