On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:42:56AM -0500, Chris Barnes is rumored to have said: > > So unless you didn't apply any security patches (gasp), I'm sure your 2 > NT servers were not continuously running from 96 to 99. >
Speaking of not applying security patches, it seems that even the mighty Microsoft can't keep their machines up-to-date and virus free: http://www.mynetwatchman.com/LIS.asp?Queue=HBRD&PID=2196 If the software publisher that created the O/S can't keep the bugs out, how can they expect the rest of the users of their products to do so? (especially considering the average level of clue that their users have) -- Steve Thomas ---------------------------------------------------------- "...subatomic matter in a particle accelerator that exists for only a few microseconds seems to exhibit more uptime than the RIAA's website." -- Andrew Orlowski TheRegister.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
