tor, 29.05.2003 kl. 00.53 skrev Simon Byrnand: > >I said: "keep your SA version up to date." I.e., don't winge if you're > >using 2.54 and the current version is 2.55." Least of all if you're > >still running 2.43. > > Sure, but what relevance does saying "What you write above certainly isn't > the case for SA 2.60-CVS......" have ? Nobody is suggesting that anyone > should be using 2.60-cvs on production machines so my point remains - > whether 2.60-cvs does or doesn't do something doesn't have any immediate > relevance to most people, *until* 2.60 is released.
I'd beg to differ. There are those on the list running 2.60-CVS, even if you are excluded from doing so. This is the only forum for comparing notes - unless one's a developer. As it is, I hold my counsel with respect to things that don't work from time to time and only comment on things that are in fact relevant. Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw http://www.billy.demon.nl Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
