A few ideas, below... >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Spamassassin List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 10:15 PM >Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Some observations on doing more with less >
> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Steve Schofield > > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 8:27 PM > > > > If I may ask, is this in a user_pref for a specific user or domain wide? > > Where is the conf file at? > > I've been running the experiments in my own account, working from a spam > <SNIP> > by truncating to 2000 byte messages we generated 7 additional falso > negatives. > That number, 7 out of 1545, isn't huge, but is noticeable. I dislike it > when any spam sneaks through. Not giving up, I'm going to try using the > first third, middle third, and last third, and see how it goes. :). I'm curious as to how many of these messages are inline-mime images, and how much this has to do with mucked-up mime bounds detection out of spamassassin (if it even does so, I'm not quite sure it does). Granted, 2000 bytes is still pretty small when you come down to it, but it might we worth seeing how much time you save truncating encoded images -- mime-decode the message, truncate the weighty bits, re-assemble... Or I guess you could even just parse out the first X bytes of a mime-section and feed that into SA... Good luck, and keep us posted.. :) -r ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
