On Wed, 28 May 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: > 3) dialup RBLs should skip the oldest one or two, but I think it already > does this part just fine.
Actually we were just talking about this tonight in another thread, "Defining my own rules." It's never really be said for sure but we're under the impression that SA will check all Received lines against dialup lists. IMHO there should be a check_dul or check_dialup rbleval option to limit the check to the most recent Received line check or to a user-defined number to account for a known number of MTA hops before SA gets its mitts on the message. Does anyone know for sure how SA handles queries against dialup DNSBLs? The checks in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf don't seem to treat DUL lists any different than the other DNSBL so I think that tells us something right there. Justin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
