Maybe SourceForge should run SA?
Actually, last I checked one of the secondary MX's (panoramix.vasoftware.com) does, and it runs an old version (2.21)... Look in message headers for it.. it always adds a spam-status header too (since I don't use the standard spam-status header, I see em every time the appear from another MTA.)
Of course, really I don't want listservers for this list running SA.. there's too many posts to the list which need to quote parts of spam that will get tagged if the do.
Personally I think SA shouldn't be run except on a destination MTA, not on a list mailer... I don't like getting mails in that have already been SA'ed as they may not have the same scoring and rule behavior I do.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
