Michael Weber wrote on Fri, 06 Jun 2003 09:43:22 -0500:

> I was reading the docs and it wasn't real clear what messages needed to
> be sent through the sa-learn process.  Do I need only ham that was
> marked as spam and spam that was not marked?  If SA auto-learns, is
> there any value in sending messages that were correctly scored back
> through the process?
>

First, you have to teach it at least 200 messages of each before it starts 
using Bayes. So, that's a good reasons for training it right away. As for 
your last question, I'm not sure. man sa-learn mentions relearning to 
improve Bayes. On the other hand it is said that any message already 
learned will be skipped ...


Kai

-- 

Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:  Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to