Michael Weber wrote on Fri, 06 Jun 2003 09:43:22 -0500: > I was reading the docs and it wasn't real clear what messages needed to > be sent through the sa-learn process. Do I need only ham that was > marked as spam and spam that was not marked? If SA auto-learns, is > there any value in sending messages that were correctly scored back > through the process? >
First, you have to teach it at least 200 messages of each before it starts using Bayes. So, that's a good reasons for training it right away. As for your last question, I'm not sure. man sa-learn mentions relearning to improve Bayes. On the other hand it is said that any message already learned will be skipped ... Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk