Since spam is a moving target, and SA is under constant development, and the newer versions always seem to do a better job of spotting the latest spam, there are some of us out here in the peanut gallery who'd like to try the latest. But we're often warned away because (1) obviously, the latest is untested, and (2) the scores haven't been brourght up-to-date. On the first point of course, if only a few people are testing SA in a live environment, SA remains untested.
On the second point, I was wondering if there might be some sort of overnight, or every-few-days automated update of the scores, and that these latest scores would become available with the latest CVS copy of SA. Further, there might be an associated test report, which lets propsective early adopters decide if they want/need this particular incarnation? One important aspect of the test report might be a comparison between the CVS'd version, and the most recently released version which gives percentages of false positives and negatives for example? Is this possible in the current SA framework? The process of scoring looks to be pretty well-automated for example. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
