>> The full report contained within the rest of the message claims that
>> SA is looking in the Received headers for the forging, and call me
>> crazy, but I don't see any hotmail.com in the Received headers here.
>> The scenario here
>
> Exactly.  The mail has a hotmail from address, but nothing in the
> Received headers says it came from hotmail, so it gets flagged.

I believe the logic is hosed there, then.  There's nothing wrong with
announcing that your email address is @hotmail.com when sending through
another machine.

I believe "forged received: header" should mean "this mail server
announced themselves as hotmail.com when their dns name resolves to
something else."

Involving the Received header in this rule just doesn't make any sense.

John





-- 
John Madden
UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech State College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com
Understand how to protect your customers personal information by implementing
SSL on your Apache Web Server. Click here to get our FREE Thawte Apache 
Guide: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0029en
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to