On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 the voices made Michael Moncur write:
MM> Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
MM>
MM> > "seks" is now getting 0.807152 on a "1 = spam and 0 = ham"-scale here, so
MM> > before your e-mail starting messing it up it was a perfect
MM> > spam-sign for my
MM> > bayesian filter; bad you. ;-)
MM>
MM> If you're letting SA train Bayes on SAtalk messages, I think you're asking
MM> for far worse trouble than this...
Well, it's actually not SA, and it does catch spam sent to SA-lists, without
any false positives (due to the low rate of spam, and that I don't remove the
footer until after the spamfilter, there have been some false negatives, of
course).
--
/\___/\ /\___/\
\_@ @_/ \_@ @_/
+--oOO-(_)-OOo------------------------------------------oOO-(_)-OOo--+
| Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! |
+---ôôô---ôôô--------------------------------------------ôôô---ôôô---+
\O/ \O/ (c)1998-2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] \O/ \O/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues.
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
