Aaron Sherman wrote on 31 Jan 2003 11:53:03 -0500: > Is it not done because of overhead concerns? Certainly, it would be > expensive. >
Possibly, but it could also reduce the processing overhead in other cases. Wouldn't it be enough to detect if an XML compliant renderer would be able to make sense out of a document? F.i. <chunder></chunder> just doesn't make any sense if there is no DTD attached. It's legal to use unknown HTML tags, but barely done for obvious purposes. So, if there's no rendering information for those obfuscating tags one could assign a score. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
