On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:06:37PM -0800, Jonathan Nichols wrote: > This one slipped through twice this week. The first tmie, I just deleted > it, thinking that someone would have reported it to Razor or something by > now. But no.. it came through again. > > I think "toner" needs a higher score. ;)
We'll have to see how the GA does for it, but in 2.50 right now:
Content analysis details: (5.00 points, 5 required)
TONER (0.7 points) BODY: Contains "Toner Cartridge"
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_01_10 (0.2 points) BODY: Razor2 gives a spam confidence level between
1 and 10
[cf: 2]
LINES_OF_YELLING (0.2 points) BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED
RAZOR2_CHECK (3.9 points) Listed in Razor2, see http://razor.sf.net/
TONER doesn't test very well, and LINES_OF_YELLING is even worse.
The Bayes stuff may work better for you on this one too depending on
what kind of mails you get. With my DB it scores around a 50% which
basically means "undeterminable" for spam vs ham. :(
But hopefully this is an example of how if you use Razor, you should
report every spam you receive. It's the only way to make the system
work better. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
He's taking funny talk.
-- Homer Simpson
Like Father, Like Clown
msg11850/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
