At Thu Jan  9 04:29:26 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> my impression (not from measuring, just from looking at spam) is that
> the checksum databases are relatively inefficient because spammers
> have started to routinely introduce random components into the message
> body such as customized greetings or random numbers.

Be that as it may, I still find that around 50% of my spam is caught
by Razor.

Martin
-- 
Martin Radford              |   "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff  -o)
Registered Linux user #9257 |  on ftp and let the rest of the world  /\\
- see http://counter.li.org |       mirror it ;)"  - Linus Torvalds _\_V


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to