At Thu Jan 9 04:29:26 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > my impression (not from measuring, just from looking at spam) is that > the checksum databases are relatively inefficient because spammers > have started to routinely introduce random components into the message > body such as customized greetings or random numbers.
Be that as it may, I still find that around 50% of my spam is caught by Razor. Martin -- Martin Radford | "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff -o) Registered Linux user #9257 | on ftp and let the rest of the world /\\ - see http://counter.li.org | mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds _\_V ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk