At 21:46 12/05/2002 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 05:51:46PM -0800, Tomki wrote: > That's the list of hits that you got when you tested that email?Yep. > I don't see the score you got. Well, I see you're using 2.50 ... Did you install 2.50 or are you just testing against 2.50? If you installed it; 1) I wouldn't do that, 2.50 is quite development quality at the moment. and 2) installing removes the test rules, so you wouldn't see the T_* rules matching.
What I meant was:
I didn't see the score that you had achieved on the message that I forwarded to the list.
My installation of 2.50 is doing alright.
The reason that I'm using this non-release is that all my previous installations of SpamAssassin would die under load. (spamd) I've posted that to this list several times, and have heard other people experiencing the same thing. by 'load', I mean 2 to 5 messages/second for more than 3 or so seconds.
There is a major problem with this version, which I've also brought to the attention of this list: Spamd 2.50 NEVER DIES. A zombie is left on the system for every message processed.
This I can work around, and is far preferable to having spamd go away once in a while. (the length of time it takes for supervise to restart spamd is too long)
I just run a kill on all the zombies once an hour.
--Tomki
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
