Ok, here it is. And please, be gentle! 1. SA 2.50 drops the SpamPhrases frequency table, which seems from limited playing on my part to comprise something like 10% of the detection in favor of Bayes. It's stated that Bayes does it better.
2. And I have faith that will be true, given the kind of testing the SA-developers do. 3. But for sysadmins who are harried, and aren't big fans of spending time gathering their own corpus, sorting it, and training every few months, Bayes will be inactive or decaying rapidly. 4. Won't their scores suffer? How much in your testing? If a considerable amount, I would think it would make more sense to offer a toggle on Bayes. mike __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET comprehensive development tool, built to increase your productivity. Try a free online hosted session at: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr0003en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
