Matt Kettler said: > As a counter argument of this, what about HTML messages being abused to > bypass bayes when only looking at the top N lines? (note: think this is on > the right track in principle, but I can see some resulting holes) > > The spammer could now bypass bayes by inserting a HTML comment at the > beginning consisting of 200 bytes or 20 lines of ham, end the comment, and > begin his spam message.
BTW we do have some very smart HTML parsing (thx Dan ;) which our Bayes impl uses, so this will not be a prob for us. --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
