Very nice. You don't say if your doing simply local or RAZOR2, DCC, ect... checks.
You have to be happy with that kind of improvement! (and price) > -----Original Message----- > From: Hugh Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 5:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Graph of caught spam > > > > Hi everyone. I work for a small ISP, and we've just installed > SpamAssassin on our front-end mail server. It's doing a LOT > better than > our previous procmail filtering -- my compliments and endless > admiration > to the authors! > > Currently we're catching nearly 2000 messages per hour, with the > threshold set at 9. I thought people might be interested in seeing a > graph of this: > > http://selenium.dowco.com/spam/spam.html > > The big increase is from when I got the graph working for what SA is > catching; previous to that it was only graphing what we caught with > procmail. > > Again, my compliments to the authors. Our users are extremely happy > with the decrease in spam. > > -- > Hugh Brown > Dowco Helpdesk > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm > Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
