Sorry gagel, I'm having trouble following you. How are you doing your config? Are all your users local, aliased, virtual, database stored, or combo?
> -----Original Message----- > From: gagel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 3:18 PM > To: Chris Petersen; Chris Santerre > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamd and virtual users. Theo > > > What about mail servers that don't? Or situations where SA > is run on a standalone in a gateway configuration and > relaying to the actual server? SpamD/SpamC is perfect for > that as it is. So would MySQL type of configuration, no? > > As it is my setup has all email scanned at the gateway and > then passed to a standalone linux box that runs only > spamd/spamc and then passes the email over to the > destination server. So in my config your idea would not > work. I know there are others that share my type of > config... > > ----- Original Message Follows ----- > ---cut--- > > info... heck, all you'd need is the directory - spamd > > can grab the owner info on that to determine which user to > > suid to. > > But I've heard no feedback on this idea other than "spamc > > is supposed to use as few resources as possible" - which I > > don't think is a valid excuse for something small like > > this - it already has the data, and is already sending > > this kind of info to spamd. > > -Chris > ---cut--- > > =========================== > Kevin W. Gagel > > -------------------------------- > The College of New Caledonia > Visit us at http://www.cnc.bc.ca > -------------------------------- > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
