Instead of changing the way SpamAssassin works, I have modified my MTA (Exim) to whitelist addresses and domains. While it may be interesting to offer the functionality mentioned in the future, I see no reason to rush getting it implemented.
hank On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 07:45:31PM -0500, Adam Henry wrote: > I am seeking comments about a problem I have been faced with. > SpamAssassin seems to check the To: and CC: headers to determine > if address match expressions contained in one of the whitelists. > Since spammers forge their To: and CC: address anyways, this isn't a > very reliable field to base tests off of. > > I propose an easy way to change a setting which would allow one to > configure which header is used for verification of this type. Such a > change could be put in a local configuration file, and thereby avoiding > the need to modify code or fear that changes will be overwritten upon > upgrading. > > Please let me know if this is interesting to any of you. Since this > sounds like a Wishlist item, is there a more appropriate place to which > this message should be sent? ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
