-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Andre Bonhote wrote:
> Hi SA-Talkers > > I just received the attached mail this morning, and I was quite upset. > For me, this is a completely new way of validating an email address. It > might be hard to catch this with SA ... Fuck. That'll will be really hard to catch. It will even be impossible to catch it, I guess, if they managed (which isn't very hard at all) to get the following lines to look more realistic: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <034b43b16c1a$7245c8a8$3ca04da0@irlfgv> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] correct Message-ID should be _very_ simple. Correct address in To will no allow spammers to use more than one RCPT on a smtp relay. Imagine they would read something like From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: what-ever-aol's-internal-client-puts-here To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How could you (as human reader) clearly identify this as spam? You sometimes do _really_ get those kinds of mails if you answer newbie questions... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: pgpenvelope 2.10.2 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/ iD8DBQE9wB+kY6Nk2Nv6ZRcRAoZzAJ9CU0jo2oE8RZiPIursFPA+1ErxwwCeJpjp +ABQOhZu6/kfVWsaLtVDL8U= =lGft -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
