Ralf Hildebrandt said: > He's wrong on this: > Fourth, and I've saved the best for last: SA is a HOG. I refuse to > fire up perl for each message, and I refuse to full-body-grep each > message that comes in. > (spamc/spamd and also it doesn't do a full body grep)
true! But it's a fundamental mismatch in approaches anyway -- accuracy costs CPU, and our position is to spend that CPU to gain the accuracy. It's an order of magnitude faster than DNSbls anyway. ;) --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
