Matt Sergeant said: > CVS contains a Bayesian(ish) filter. -ish in the same way that all other "bayesian" spam filters are not really using classical "naive Bayesian" classification ;)
It works well, increasing the accuracy nicely. We've been talking about it on -devel (since it's still in development, after all). Feel free to download a CVS snapshot and play around, but do note that it is CVS, and may have glitches [*]. (*: 1 glitch, for example: I made a boo-boo last night, forgot to check in code for an eval test, resulting in a "test not found" warning message from each message checked -- it still filters OK, but is noisy. sorry, bleeding-edge folks ;) --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Are you worried about your web server security? Click here for a FREE Thawte Apache SSL Guide and answer your Apache SSL security needs: http://www.gothawte.com/rd523.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
