Thanks for the advice. I was afraid that would be needed. It's deleted now, so it will be interesting to see how that affects its operation.
Ollie On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 11:44:13AM -0400, Rob Mangiafico wrote: > Ollie: > > I would recommend deleting the database and starting fresh. 2.42 put some > heavy negative numbers in there, so the DB is more corrupt than accurate > at this point. Deleting it will allow it to track spam and non-spam in a > much better manner now. > > Some people have even recommended running without an AWL at all, although > I still use it. > > On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Ollie Acheson wrote: > > > I asked this a few days ago, but the question got buried in another thread. > > > > I upgraded to 2.43 to overcome the AWL problem. My question is how > > long will it take SA to flush the erroneous AWL scores? Should I just > > let nature (or SA in this case) take its course, or should I delete > > the AWL database and let it start over? The database is 1.3 Mb. > > Rob M. > -- |---------------------------| | Ollie Acheson | | Morristown, NJ | |---------------------------| ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Access Your PC Securely with GoToMyPC. Try Free Now https://www.gotomypc.com/s/OSND/DD _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
