http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1071
Relevant quotes:
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-08 06:51 -------
OK, it's a moot point; I've seen the light and reverted the change ;)
Kevin's point (dictionary attacks + a global AWL = whitelisting of
a spam-run while it happens) is the final nail in the coffin. I
hadn't thought of that.
The code in CVS is now reverted. mgm, fancy trying it out?
------- Additional Comments From Michael Moncur 2002-10-11 06:49 -------
OK, I did a quick test spamming myself. Seven messages in a row, same spam test
string, all scored 15.6. So the shrinking spam score issue is gone.
Then I sent myself some nonspam messages from the same account: scores 9.4,
8.7, 8.1... autoblacklist works.
Finally, sent myself nonspam from a different account, scored -2.7. Then sent a
10-point spam from that account, scored 2.3. So the autowhitelist works.
I'd say this one's fixed.
At 04:43 PM 10/12/2002 -0400, Ollie Acheson wrote:
Same here. Lots of obvious spam, many rules invoked, but AWL letting
the dirt in. Very disappointing.
Ollie
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 12:07:36PM -0500, Rob.Remus wrote:
> Since upgrading from 2.40 to 2.42 we have been seeing some strange stuff
> with the AWL. We're getting obvious spam matching numerous rules, including
> the AWL, which results in negative scores, some < -90.
>
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk