On 9 Oct 2002, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Simon Lyall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm getting a few false positives and noticed that a common factor seems > > to be that the first component is "rtn" . The lists appear to be legit but > > they are getting picked up for NO_MX_FOR_FROM, > > What version of SA? > > They all have A records which is also accepted in SA 2.42 and should > not trigger NO_MX_FOR_FROM.
2.2 , I didn't check realize that the rules had changed. sorry. -- Simon Lyall. | Newsmaster | Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ihug, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
