On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 06:23:35PM +0200, Per Goetterup wrote: > I'm using SpamAssassin and I'm also handling our abuse-mails, which is a > somewhat bad combination because all complaint messages from SpamCop also gets > tagged as spam, which in a way is correct but very unfortunate because then I > won't see them - and that's pretty bad.
Depending on your setup, the safest thing might be to either not run SpamAssassin on the abuse mailbox or not react to SpamAssassin if it runs system-wide. That probably means a separate Mailbox for abuse-mails, or at least a "plussed" address. I have lots of plussed addresses and quite a few are not "protected", e.g. this mailing list. Jost -- | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please help stamp out spam! | | Postmaster, JAPH, resident answer machine am RZ der RUB | | Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate | | William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) | ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
