Theo Van Dinter said: > On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 10:35:37AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: > > Is this likely to happen, or are the 2.50-cvs scores already more "recent" > > in some sense? > > The GA hasn't been run for 2.50 yet I don't think, so the scores will > be taken care of then.
Actually, I did run it just after generating the 2.42 score-set, for the ruleset we're using in 2.50. So 2.50's scores are just as good as 2.42's. --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
