It hits plenty of body rules in 2.41. Of course, some of the scores are a 
lil weird in 2.41, but 2.42 should fix some of that (I *think* the rule 
pruning and new GA results are going into 2.42)

But since it is positive-hit in 2.31, and positive hit in 2.41, I think 
it's a more-or-less moot point. This isn't a false-neg in either case, and 
I think the newer GA scores will do better for the body total points.

In any case, I'm generally not concerned with making sure each and every 
spam has a body-rule hit. Sure it's nice, but if it's tagged correctly 
anyway, I don't see it as being a big problem. Heck, well over half my spam 
gets tagged for just the headers anyway... INVALID_DATE or TZ_ABSURD are 
very common.

SPAM: Content analysis details:   (13.90 hits, 5.9 required)
SPAM: INVALID_DATE       (1.6 points)  Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822)
SPAM: DEAR_SOMEBODY      (-1.0 points) BODY: Contains 'Dear Somebody'
SPAM: US_DOLLARS_2       (-0.5 points) BODY: Nigerian scam key phrase 
($NNN.N m/USDN
NN.N m/US$NN.N m)
SPAM: DEAR_SOMETHING     (1.0 points)  BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)'
SPAM: SPAM_PHRASE_05_08  (0.7 points)  BODY: Spam phrases score is 05 to 08 
(medium)
SPAM:                    [score: 7]
SPAM: RAZOR2_CHECK       (3.9 points)  Listed in Razor2, see 
http://razor.sf.net/
SPAM: DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 (1.5 points)  Date: is 6 to 12 hours before 
Received: date
SPAM: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS      (1.3 points)  Subject is all capitals
SPAM: RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM (0.4 points)  RBL: Received via a relay in 
relays.osirus
oft.com
SPAM:                    [RBL check: found 
18.64.181.213.relays.osirusoft.com., type
: 127.0.0.4]
SPAM: RCVD_IN_RFCI       (2.3 points)  RBL: Received via a relay in 
ipwhois.rfc-igno
rant.org
SPAM:                    [RBL check: found 
18.64.181.213.ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org.,
type: 127.0.0.6]
SPAM: X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC   (2.7 points)  RBL: DNSBL: sender is Confirmed Spam 
Source
SPAM:


At 10:41 AM 9/26/2002 -0700, Simon Matthews wrote:
>The attached email did not get any hits from body checks in SA 2.31.
>
>Anyone care to take a look at it?
>
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to