On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 12:50:52PM -0500, Doug Dempsey wrote: > Why would SA not be tagging spam when the required hits have been exceeded? > > qmail-scanner-1.12 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4224. spamassassin: 2.41. . > Clear:SA:0(21.5/6.0):. Processed in 1.799955 secs); 25 Sep 2002 > 17:49:15 -0000 > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=21.5 required=6.0
Since it's not listing out the tests= or version= bits, I'm assuming
qmail-scanner isn't doing the right thing. Does SA work properly when
you just use it instead of qmail-scanner?
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Y'know, there are other possibilities if we assume that filenames
are UTF-8...yikes...wait, put down that meat cleaver! Aieeee!!!
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
msg08107/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
